Sphygmomanometers for Clinical Use
| MANUAL DEVICES | AUTOMATED DEVICES | FINGER DEVICES |
The following tables are lists of currently available Mercury, Aneroid and Non-Mercury Manual Sphygmomanometers, Automated Devices for Clinical Use and Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement. Discontinued devices are shown on a separate table. A complete list of all devices is available on our Device Index.
Manual Devices
Device |
Mode |
AAMI |
BHS |
ESH 2002 |
ESH 2010 |
ISO 81060-2:2013 |
ISO 81060-2:2018 |
Circumstance |
Recommendation Ref |
A&D UM-101 |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Without use of "Mark" button |
Recommended 7 |
|
|
Fail |
|
|
|
With use of "Mark" button |
Not Recommended 7 |
A&D UM-102 |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
A&D UM-101 Equivalence, Without use of "Mark" button |
Recommended E137 |
Accoson Greenlight 300 |
Electronic Display |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 1 |
Heine Gamma G7 |
Aneroid |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 6 |
Heine Gamma XXL-LF |
Aneroid |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 6 |
Microlife BP 3AS1-2 |
Electronic |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 10 |
Microlife WatchBP Office |
Electronic |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 8 |
Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB |
Electronic |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
WatchBP Office Equivalence |
Recommended E29 |
Nissei DM-3000 |
Electronic Display |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
2.5 mmHg/s deflation rate |
Recommended 12 |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
"Blinded mode" with use of "Mark" button |
Recommended 12 |
Pic Solution (Artsana) Pic Indolor (Artsana) Professional Check |
Electronic + Osc Help |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 11 |
Plusmed pM-NT 01 |
Electronic |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Microlife BP3AS1-2 Equivalence |
Recommended E125 |
PMS Mandaus |
|
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Abstract; Protocol violation |
Questionable 2 |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Minor adjustments |
Recommended 5 |
PyMaH Mercury |
Hg |
Pass |
A/A |
NA |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 3 |
Rossmax Mandaus II |
LCD Display |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 9 |
Welch-Allyn Maxi Stabil 3 |
Aneroid |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Small recruitment violation |
Recommended 4 |
References for Validation of Manual Devices
1 |
Graves JW, Tibor M, Murtagh B, Klein L, Sheps SG. The Accoson Greenlight 300 - the first non-automated mercury-free blood pressure measurement device to pass the International Protocol for blood pressure measuring devices in adults Blood Press Monit 2004;9:13-17 |
2 |
Shabeeh H, Cuckson AC, Jones C, Randhawa M, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory blood
pressure measuring device: the PMS Mandaus.[dabl® Educational Trust regrets that full details are missing]S.233 (Abstract)
|
3 |
O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Inaccuracy of seven popular sphygmomanometers for home-measurement of blood pressure. J Hypertens 1990;8:621-634. |
4 |
Reinders A, Jones C, Cuckson A, Shennan A, The Maxi Stabil 3: Validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2003;8:83-89 |
5 |
Wilton A, Shabeeh H, Cuckson C, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus) Blood Press Monit 2006;11:161-164 |
6 |
Dorigatti F, Bonso E, Zanier A, Palatini P. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:29-33 |
7 |
Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Gkinos CP, Tzamouranis DG. Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:37-42 |
8 |
Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit 2008;13:299-303 |
9 |
Tasker F, de Greeff A, Liu B, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II Blood Press Monit 2009;14:121-124 |
10 |
de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2008;13:342-348 |
11 |
Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458 |
12 |
Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616 |
Automated Devices for Clinical Use
For a complete list of devices see our Device Index and for discontinued devices see our Discontinued Devices Index.
Device |
Mode |
AAMI |
BHS |
ESH 2002 |
ESH 2010 |
ISO 81060-2:2013 |
ISO 81060-2:2018 |
Circumstance |
Recommendation Ref |
A&D TM-2564G |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Serious protocol violations |
Questionable 18 |
A&D TM-2655 |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Methods poorly explained |
Questionable 70 |
A&D TM-2656 |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 56 |
A&D TM-2657 |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
A&D TM-2656 Equivalence |
Recommended E136 |
A&D UM-201 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest Cuff sizes of 16-24, 22-32, and 31-45 cm. |
Recommended 80 |
A&D UM-211 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest Cuff sizes of 16-24, 22-32 and 31-45cm. |
Recommended 81 |
Andon KD-595 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 73 |
Andon KD-5031 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 72 |
Andon KD-5917 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 66 |
Beurer BM45 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Grandway G.Lab MD2680 Equivalence |
Recommended E228 |
Beurer BM85 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
iHealth BP3 Equivalence |
Recommended E126 |
BpTRU BPM-100 BPM-300 |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
At rest. Pressure ranges |
Recommended 5, 6 |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
Children |
Questionable 12 |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Mixed adult/paediatric population Protocol Violations Should have used 1990 instead of 1993 BHS criteria but still A/A |
Questionable 13 |
BpTRU (unspecified) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass Ad Hoc Protocol; Abstract |
Questionable 14 |
CA-MI Srl CHIESI 0100000328 (DIESIS PLUS) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Nissei DSK-1011 Equivalence |
Recommended E139 |
CA-MI Srl CHIESI 0100000329 (DIESIS) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Nissei DSK-1011 Equivalence |
Recommended E138 |
Citizen CHU305 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Andon KD-5917 Equivalence |
Recommended E124 |
Citizen CHUD514 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Andon KD-595 Equivalence |
Recommended E179 |
Citizen CHUD517 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Andon KD-5917 Equivalence |
Recommended E180 |
Colin 8800C |
Osc |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
AAMI only |
Questionable 23 |
CVProfilor DO-2020 |
Dynamic linear deflation, Osc & Acoustic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New methodology, Passed Ad-hoc protocol |
Questionable 9 |
Datascope Accutorr Plus |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 1 |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
Trimline cuff replacement, at rest, protocol variation |
Questionable 17 |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Children. Adaptation of protocol along BHS guidelines. |
Recommended 22 |
DiaTecne PulsePen |
Tonometry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract; Pass ad hoc protocol; Developer assessment |
Questionable 16 |
Dinamap ProCare |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 21 |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 24 |
Dinamap ProCare-120 |
Osc |
|
|
Fail |
|
|
|
Children. Adaptation of protocol along BHS guidelines. |
Not Recommended 22 |
Dixtal DX-2020 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Fail |
|
|
At rest |
Not Recommended 57 |
Erkameter 125 PRO |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 71 |
Foracare Fora P30 Plus |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 52 |
G-Care Electronics SP-800 |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Abstract Only |
Questionable 29 |
Hanvon FF680 |
Aus |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
At rest |
Recommended 243 |
HARTMANN Tensoval Duo Control |
Aus-Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 30 |
HARTMANN Tensoval Duo Control II |
Aus-Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
Pass* |
|
|
*ESH-IP 2010 in Aus mode only |
Recommended 55 |
HARTMANN Veroval Duo Control |
Aus-Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
Pass* |
|
|
*ESH-IP 2010 in Aus mode only HARTMANN Tensoval Duo Control II Equivalence |
Recommended E181 |
Health and Life (Health & Life) HL-868ED |
Osc |
|
A/A |
|
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 82 |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 83 |
Hingmed DBP-01P |
Electronic Display |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
At rest |
Recommended 87 |
HoMedics BPA-300 |
Aus & Osc |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
Sample size well over 85. Low mean BP |
Questionable 25 |
iHealth BP3 (KD-931) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 44 |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
KD-5915 Equivalence |
Recommended E60 |
InBody BPBIO250 |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
At rest ISO 81060-2:2018 |
Recommended 84 |
InBody BPBIO320 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 77 |
InBody BPBIO320N |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence |
Recommended E190 |
InBody BPBIO320S |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence |
Recommended E189 |
InBody BPBIO330 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence |
Recommended E188 |
InBody BPBIO330N |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence |
Recommended E212 |
InBody BPBIO480KV |
Aus & Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass (2020-01) |
At rest |
Recommended 132 |
InBody BPBIO750 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence |
Recommended E187 |
InBody HBP170 |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
InBody BP170 Equivalence |
Recommended E211 |
InBody HBP570 |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
InBody BPBIO250 Equivalence |
Recommended E210 |
JAMR B23 |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass (+1:2020) |
At rest |
Recommended 251 |
JAMR F1701T |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
At rest |
Recommended 178 |
JOYTECH DBP-1333b |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass (+1:2020) |
At rest |
Recommended 194 |
JOYTECH DBP-6279B |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
At rest |
Recommended 115 |
JOYTECH DBP-8278B |
Wrist |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass (+1:2020) |
At rest |
Recommended 94 |
KOROT P3 Accurate |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
InBody BPBIO480KV Equivalence |
Recommended E372 |
Lohmeier B-606 |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Abstract |
Questionable 4 |
Microlife BP 3AS1-2 |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 34 |
|
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Pregnancy |
Recommended 68 |
|
B/A |
|
|
|
|
Pre-Eclampsia |
Recommended 68 |
Microlife WatchBP Home (BP3MX1-1) |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 61 |
|
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Pregnancy |
Recommended 62 |
|
B/A |
|
|
|
|
Pre-Eclampsia |
Recommended 62 |
Microlife WatchBP Home A (BP3MX1-3) |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Watch BP Home Equivalence |
Recommended E27 |
Microlife WatchBP Home N (BP3MX1-4) |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Watch BP Home Equivalence |
Recommended E70 |
Microlife WatchBP Home S (BP3MX1-5) |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Watch BP Home Equivalence |
Recommended E28 |
Microlife WatchBP O3 (3MZ0) |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 38 |
Microlife WatchBP O3 (3MZ1) |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 39 |
Microlife WatchBP Office |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 33 |
Microlife WatchBP Office ABI |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 42 FTS |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
L-XL size cuff |
Recommended 45 |
Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB |
Electronic |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
WatchBP Office Equivalence |
Recommended E29 |
Microlife WatchBP Office Target |
Electronic |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
BP A100 Equivalence |
Recommended E37 |
Nissei DM-3000 |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Automatic Mode |
Recommended 37 |
Nissei DS-A10 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
DSK-1011 Equivalence |
Recommended E121 |
Nissei DS-B10 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
DSK-1011 Equivalence |
Recommended E122 |
Nissei DS-G10 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
DSK-1011 Equivalence |
Recommended E128 |
Nissei DS-N10 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
DSK-1031 Equivalence |
Recommended E129 |
Nissei DS-S10 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
DSK-1031 Equivalence |
Recommended E130 |
Nissei DSK-1011 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 48 |
Nissei DSK-1031 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 49 |
Nissei DSK-1051 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
DSK-1031 Equivalence |
Recommended E98 |
Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
|
Recommended 20 |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Minor recruitment modification |
Recommended 19 |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Children and adolescents. Reasonable adaptation of protocol. |
Recommended 3 |
Omron 725 CIC (HEM-725CIC) |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ad Hoc Protocol. |
None 26 |
Omron 907 (HEM-907-E) |
Aus & Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Data analysed according to IP proposal only, Osc mode only |
Questionable 10 |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
At rest, Osc mode only, AAMI only, Recruitment violation |
Questionable 11 |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Elderly Population. Mode not stated. |
Recommended 27 |
|
|
Fail |
|
|
|
In ESRD before and after haemodialysis, Osc mode only |
Not Recommended 36 |
Omron HBP-1100 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron HBP-1300 Equivalence |
Recommended E116 |
Omron HBP-1120 |
Osc |
Pass |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron HBP-1320 Equivalence |
Recommended E186 |
Omron HBP-1300 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 65 |
Omron HBP-1320 |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
At rest |
Recommended 78 |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 79 |
Omron HBP-9030 |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
Omron HBP-9031C Equivalence |
Recommended E217 |
Omron HBP-9031C |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
General population; At rest |
Recommended 86 |
Omron HBP-T105 |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
High speed mode with smart inflation |
Recommended 31 |
Omron HEM-7130 (Japanese model) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 58 |
Omron HEM-7250-IT |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron HEM-7251G Equivalence |
Recommended E102 |
Omron HEM-7251G |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 53 |
Omron HEM-7252G-HP |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 67 |
Omron HEM-7320F |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 59 |
Omron HEM-7500F |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 60 |
Omron EVOLV (HEM-7600T-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass* |
|
|
Pregnancy * Modified ESH-IP 2010 |
Recommended 74 |
Omron i-Q142 (HEM-1040-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 51 |
Omron M2 (HEM-7121-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron HEM-7130 (Japanese model) Equivalence |
Recommended E112 |
Omron M2 Basic (HEM-7120-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron HEM-7130 (Japanese model) Equivalence |
Recommended E111 |
Omron M3 (HEM-7131-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E113 |
Omron M3 (HEM-7154-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E197 |
Omron M3 Comfort (HEM-7134-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E140 |
|
|
|
Pass* |
|
|
Pregnancy * Modified ESH-IP 2010 |
Recommended 75 |
Omron M3 Comfort (HEM-7155-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E199 |
Omron M3 IT (HEM-7131U-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E114 |
Omron M3W (HEM-7202-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 50 |
Omron M4-I (HEM-752-E) |
Osc |
Pass |
A/A |
Pass |
|
|
|
705IT (HEM-759-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E15 |
Omron M4 Intelli IT (HEM-7155T-EBK) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E199 |
Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 64 |
Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 63 |
Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7360-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E201 |
Omron M6 Comfort IT (HEM-7322U-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E115 |
Omron M7 Intelli IT (HEM-7322T-E) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E154 |
Omron M7 Intelli IT (HEM-7361T-EBK) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E202 |
Omron MIT Elite (HEM-7300-WE) |
Osc |
|
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Pregnancy |
Recommended 43 |
|
A/A |
|
|
|
|
Pre-Eclampsia |
Recommended 43 |
Omron (Colin) Pressmate BP10 |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 31 |
Omron X3 Comfort (HEM-7155-EO) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E203 |
Omron X4 Smart (HEM-7155T-ESL) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E206 |
Omron X6 Comfort (HEM-7360-EO) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E204 |
Omron X7 Smart (HEM-7361T-ESL) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence |
Recommended E205 |
Pic Solution (Artsana) Pic Indolor (Artsana) CARDIOSimple |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Andon KD-5917 Equivalence |
Recommended E146 |
Plusmed pM-NT 01 |
Osc |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
Microlife BP3AS1-2 Equivalence |
Recommended E125 |
Primo RACD |
Radial artery compression |
(Pass) |
|
|
|
|
|
RAL catheter in ICU. Limited sample. Device "shows promise" (Authors). |
Questionable 32 |
SAFETY PRONTEX INTEGRA (NISSEI DS-B33-03) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Nissei DSK-1011 Equivalence |
Recommended E167 |
SAFETY PRONTEX SYNTESI (NISSEI DS-B23-03) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Nissei DSK-1011 Equivalence |
Recommended E166 |
Somnomedics Somnotouch-NIBP |
Wrist PTT |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 69 |
Spengler Tensionic Mod EPS 112 |
Osc |
Pass |
B/A |
|
|
|
|
At rest; Abstract |
Questionable 2 |
SunTech Medical SunTech 247 |
Osc |
Pass; |
A/A |
Pass |
|
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 35 |
Terumo ES-H55 |
Osc Double-cuff |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer Assessment |
Questionable 15 |
Thermor Bios BD215 |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 54 |
Transtek TMB-2266 |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass (+1:2020) |
At rest |
Recommended 231 |
UEBE Visomat Comfort E (Ref 24016) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Double Comfort (Osc Mode) Equivalence |
Recommended E104 |
UEBE Visomat Comfort Eco (Ref 24026) |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Double Comfort (Osc Mode) Equivalence |
Recommended E135 |
UEBE Visomat Double Comfort |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 41, 47 |
Aus |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 40, 46 |
Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs |
Osc |
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
Only Method 1 completed. Ages 5-77 |
Questionable 28 |
YuWell YE660D |
Osc |
|
|
|
|
|
Pass (+1:2020 |
At rest |
Recommended 205 |
YuWell YE690A |
Osc |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
At rest |
Recommended 76 |
References for Validation of Automated Devices for Clinical Use
1 |
Anwar YA, Tendler BE, McCabe EJ, Mansoor GA, White WB. Evaluation of the Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Blood Press Monit 1997;2(2):105-10 |
2 |
Bobrie G, Battaglia C. Assessment of Tensionic Mod EPS 112 semi-automatic device of blood pressure measurement (Manufactured by Spengler - France) J Hypertens 1999:17 (suppl 3):S22-S23. Abstract |
3 |
Stergiou GS, Yiannes NG, Rarra VC. Validation of the Omron 705IT oscillometric device for home blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents: The Arsakion School Study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006,11:229-234 |
4 |
Pujol E, Jimenez L, Estrada D, de la Sierra A. Accuracy of the automated oscillometric device Lohmeier B-606 for measurement of blood pressure in hospitals AJH 2002;15:74 A (Abstract) |
5 |
Mattu GS, Perry TL, Wright JM. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:153-159 |
6 |
Wright JM, Mattu GS, Perry TL, Gelfer M, Strange KD, Zorn A, Chen Y. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor Blood Press Monit 2001;6:161-165 |
7 |
Jones CR, Taylor K, Poston L, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor J Hum Hypertens 2001;15:191-195 |
8 |
Braam RL, de Maat CHA, Thien TH. Accuracy of the Welch Allyn Vital Signs Monitor 52000 Blood Pressure Measuring Device J Hypertens 2001;19 (suppl 2):S24 (Abstract) |
9 |
Prisant LM, Resnick LM, Hollenberg SM. Assessment of sequential same arm agreement of blood pressure measurements by a CVProfilor DO-2020TM versus a Baumanometer® mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:149-152 |
10 |
El Assaad MA, Topouchian JA, Darne BM, Asmar RG. Validation of the Omron HEM-907 device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2002;7:237-241 |
11 |
White WB, Anwar YA. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults Blood Press Monit 2001;6:107-110 |
12 |
Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Comparison of the automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTru) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population Blood Press Monit 2004;9:39-45 |
13 |
Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Overall accuracy of the BpTru - an automated electronic blood pressure device Blood Press Monit 2004;9:47-52 |
14 |
Graves JW, Nash C, Baily KR, Sheps SG. Utility of an automated blood pressure (BP) measuring device (BPTru) in clinical decision making. American Journal of Hypertension 2003;16(No 5, Part 2):49A (Abstract P-29) |
15 |
Tochikubo O, Nishijima K, Ohshige K, Kimura K. Accuracy and applicability of the Terumo ES-H55 double-cuff sphygmomanometer for hospital use Blood Press Monit 2003;8:203-209 |
16 |
Salvi P, Lio G, Ricci E, Labat C, Benetos A. Validation of a new hand-held transcutaneous arterial tonometer for a non-invasive evaluation of blood pressure values, pulse wave morphology and central hemodynamic parameters J Hypertens 2004;22 (suppl 1):S130 (Abstract P465) |
17 |
White W, Herbst T, Thavarajah S, Giacco S. Clinical evaluation of the Trimline blood pressure cuffs with the Accutorr Plus Monitor Blood Press Monit 2003;8:137-140 |
18 |
Kobalava ZD , Kotovskaya YV , Rodionov EV, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2564G device for in-hospital blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring 2005;10:333-335 |
19 |
Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:27-32 |
20 |
El Assad M, Topouchian J, Asmar R. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT Blood Press Monit 2003;8(3):127-133 |
21 |
Reinders A, Reggiori F , Shennan AH. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population Blood Press Monit 2006;11:293-296 |
22 |
Wong SN, Sung RYT, Leung LCK. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:281-291 |
23 |
Pergola PE, White CL, Graves JW, Coffey CS, Tonarelli SB, Hart RG, Benavente OR for the SPS3 investigators. Reliability and validity of blood pressure measurement in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:1-8 |
24 |
de Greeff A, Reggiori F, Shennan AH. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:51-55 |
25 |
Yarows SA. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using the auscultatory method Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:339-343 |
26 |
Fonseca-Reyes S, Cervantes-Munguia R, de Alba-Garcia JG, Parra-Carrillo JZ, Lopez-Maldonado F, Montes-Casillas M. Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:321-327 |
27 |
Omboni S, Riva I, Giglio I, Caldara G, Groppelli A, Parati G. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:233-242 |
28 |
Alpert BS. Validation of the Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs blood pressure device according to the ANSI/AAMI SP10: 2002. Accuracy and cost-efficiency successfully combined Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:345-347 |
29 |
Topouchian J, El Feghali R, El Assaad H, Pannier B, Asmar R. Validation of the G-Care Electronics SP-8000 (op. cit. SP-800 ) Device for Blood Pressure Measurement According to the International Validation Protocol Journal of Hypertension 2006;25(suppl 2):S172 (Abstract) |
30 |
de Greeff A, Arora J, Hervey S, Liu B, Shennan AH. Accuracy assessment of the Tensoval duo control according to the British and European Hypertension Societies' standards Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:111-116 |
31 |
Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458 |
32 |
Fix ML, Goldstein JN, Listwa TM, Nelson SW, Thomas SH. Comparison of a radial artery compression device with invasive radial artery blood pressure monitoring Blood Press Monit 2008;13:199-203 |
33 |
Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit 2008;13:299-303 |
34 |
de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2008;13:342-348 |
35 |
Friz HP, Facchetti R, Primitz L, Beltrame L, Galbiati V, Ricioppo A, Bombelli M, Sega R. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:222-227 |
36 |
Czarkowski M, Staszków M, Kostyra K, Shebani Z, Niemczyk S, Matuszkiewicz-Rowi?ska J. Determining the accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Omron HEM-907 before and after hemodialysis. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:232-238 |
37 |
Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616 |
38 |
Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, Protogerou A. Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24(3):207-12. |
39 |
Ragazzo F, Saladini F, Palatini P. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 device for clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the International Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2010;15(1):59-62. |
40 |
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(4):208-210. |
41 |
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol, revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(5):262-264 |
42 |
Saladini F, Benetti E, Masiero S, Palatini P. Accuracy of Microlife WatchBP Office ABI monitor assessed according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension protocol and the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(5):258-261 |
43 |
Chung Y, Brochut MC, de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Clinical accuracy of inflationary oscillometry in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: Omron-MIT Elite. Preg Hyper: An Int J Women's Card Health 2012 (In press) doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.001 |
44 |
Chen C, Shang F, Wang J, Chen J, Ji N, Wan Y. Validation of the iHealth BP3 upper-arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2012;17(6):253-256. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32835b9ecb |
45 |
Masiero S, Saladini F, Benetti E, Palatini P. Accuracy of the Microlife large-extra large-sized cuff (32-52 cm) coupled to an automatic oscillometric device. Blood Press Monit. 2011;16(2):99-102. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328344c73c |
46 |
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of UEBE Visomat_Double_Comfort (Auscultatory Mode).pdf. |
47 |
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of UEBE Visomat_Double_Comfort (Oscillometric Mode).pdf. |
48 |
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1011 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Sep 01. 9 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Nissei DSK-1011.pdf. |
49 |
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1031 upper arm oscillometric blood pressure monitor intended for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Oct 28. 3 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Nissei DSK-1031.pdf. |
50 |
Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron M3W upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Mar 01. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M3W (HEM-7202-E).pdf |
51 |
Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron i-Q142(HEM-1040-E), an upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Jun 07. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron i-Q142 (HEM-1040-E).pdf |
52 |
Ding D. Validation of the FORA P30 Plus Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor, for Clinic Use and Self/Home Measurement, According to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Oct 19. 6 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Foracare Fora P30 Plus.pdf |
53 |
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7251G upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Feb 01. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7251G.pdf |
54 |
Palatini P. Validation of the Thermor Bios BP215 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Oct 09. 11 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Thermor Bios BD215.pdf |
55 |
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Tensoval Duo Control II blood pressure monitor for clinic use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension Society protocol and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328360fb52 |
56 |
Zeng WF, Liu M, Kang YY, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the fully automated A&D TM-2656 blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):223-6. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624abd |
57 |
Gothardo AC, Savioli AF, Santos DS, Lamas JL. Lack of validation of the Dixtal (DX 2020) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinical use in an intensive care unit, according to the European Society of Hypertension-International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):215-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624ad7 |
58 |
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7130 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7130.pdf |
59 |
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7320F upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7500F.pdf |
60 |
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7500F upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7500F.pdf |
61 |
Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Charilaos P. Gkinos CP, Patouras JD. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol Blood Press Monit 2007;12:185-188 |
62 |
Chung Y, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation and Compliance of a Home Monitoring Device in Pregnancy: Microlife WatchBP Home. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009;28(3):348-59. |
63 |
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E).pdf |
64 |
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E).pdf |
65 |
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HBP-1300 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 May 22. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HBP-1300.pdf |
66 |
Guo WG1, Li BL, He Y, Xue YS, Wang HY, Zheng QS, Xiang DC. Validation of the Andon KD-5917 automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. Blood Press Monit 2014;19(4):242-5. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000048 |
67 |
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the Omron HEM-7252G-HP upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2015 Jan 16. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7252G-HP.pdf |
68 |
Hannah L. Nathan, Annemarie de Greeff, Natasha L. Hezelgrave, Lucy C. Chappell and Andrew H. Shennan. Validation of the Microlife 3AS1-2 semi-automated blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society. Blood Pressure Monitoring 2015;20:52-55 |
69 |
Bilo G., Zorzi C., Ochoa Munera J.E., Torasco C., Giuli V. and Parati G. Validation of the Somnotouch-NIBP non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Pressure Monitoring 2015 Oct; 20(5):291-94 doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000124 |
70 |
Kobalava ZD, Kotovskaya YV, Babaeva LA, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2006;11:87-90 doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000200484.49540.12. |
71 |
Beimea B., Deutscha C., Krügera R., Zimmermannb E. and Bramlagea P. Validation of the blood pressure measurement device Erkameter 125 PRO according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.
Blood Press Monit. 2016 Dec;21(6):356-360. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000216
|
72 |
Wua N, Zhangb X, Wangb W and Zhangb H. Validation of the Andon KD5031 for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2016 Oct; 21(5):310-312(3). doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000204 |
73 |
Wua N, Zhangb X, Wangb W and Zhangb H. Validation of the Andon KD595 for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2016 Apr;21(2):124-7. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000164 |
74 |
TOPOUCHIAN J., ZELVEIAN P. and ASMAR R. Validation of the automatic blood pressure measurements device, the OMRON EVOLV (HEM- 7600 T-E)® in Pregnancy according to the Modified European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP). [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2018 Jan 08. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of OMRON EVOLV (HEM-7600 T-E) v2.pdf
|
75 |
TOPOUCHIAN J., ZELVEIAN P. and ASMAR R. Validation of the automatic blood pressure measurements device, the OMRON M3 COMFORT (HEM -7134-E)® in Pregnancy according to the Modified European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP). [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2018 Jan 08. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of OMRON M3 COMFORT (HEM-7134-E) v2.pdf
|
76 |
Chen Q., Lei L., Li Y. and Wang JG. Validation of the YuWell YE690A upper-arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2017 Oct;22(5):295-297. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000278
|
77 |
Kollias A., Stambolliu E., Kyriakoulis KG., Papadatos SS., Stergiou GS. Validation of the single-cuff oscillometric blood pressure monitor InBody BPBIO320 for public use according to the 2010 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. 2018 Dec 7; doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000359
|
78 |
Takahashil H., Nishiyauchi K.,Yoshikawa N. and Hishiki Y. A clinical evaluation report of the performance of the OMRON digital blood pressure monitor, HBP-1320, on accuracy as compared to the value measured by auscultation with a mercury sphygmomanometer. Available from: OMRON HBP-1320 Validation - AAMI ISO 81060-2.2013.pdf
|
79 |
Takahashi H. Validation of the OMRON HBP-1320 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HBP-1320.pdf
|
80 |
Fania C., Albertini F. and Palatini P. Validation of the A&D UM-201 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010.
Blood Press Monit. 2017 Aug;22(4):234-237. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000257
|
81 |
Fania C., Albertini F. and Palatini P. Validation of the A&D UM-211 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.
Blood Press Monit. 2017 Oct;22(5):302-305. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000266
|
82 |
Zhang W, L L, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the HL868ED upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinical use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
Blood Press Monit. 2019 Aug;24(4):203-207. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000384
|
83 |
Zhang W., Lei L., Li Y., Wang JG. Validation of the HL868ED upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.
Blood Press Monit. 2019 Oct 25. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000411
|
84 |
Kollias, Anastasios; Gravvani, Areti; Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis; Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G.; Bountzona, Ioanna; Menti, Ariadni; Stergiou, George S. Validation of the InBody BPBIO250 oscillometric blood pressure monitor for professional office use in general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.
Blood Pressure Monitoring: April 2020 - Volume 25 - Issue 2 - p 115-117. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000428
|
86 |
Kanako Saito, Yukiko Hishiki, Hakuo Takahashi. Validation of the Omron HBP-9031C professional office blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol.
Journal of human hypertension: 2020 Jan 22. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-0301-0
|
87 |
Validation of the Hingmed DBP-01P clinical automatic blood pressure monitor provided with wide-range cuff, evaluated in a general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 Protocol
Claudio Fania, Antonella Giletto, Valentina Zanello and Paolo Palatini.
Blood Pressure Monitoring 28(2):p 116-120, April 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000638
|
94 |
Validation of the DBP-8278B Wrist-type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor in the general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol. Qi Zhou. Blood Pressure Monitoring:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000717
Available from
|
115 |
Validation of the JOYTECH DBP-6279B blood pressure monitor in adults and adolescents according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard(ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020)
Baojing Duana, Le Heb, Jianling Zhangc, Lixiu Fangd and Gang Lia.
Blood Pressure Monitoring ():10.1097/MBP.0000000000000662, July 12, 2023. | DOI: DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000662
|
132 |
Validation of the InBody BPBIO480KV validation according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard. Angeliki Ntineri, Aikaterini Theodosiadi, Ariadni Menti, Konstantinos G. Kyriakoulis, Vasileios Ntousopoulos, Anastasios Kollias, and George S. Stergiou
Journal of Hypertension 41(2):p 356-361, February 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003341
|
178 |
Validation of the JAMR F1701T (arm type) pressure monitor according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/ISO 81060-2:2018 protocol. Li, Jing; Han, Li-Hong; Feng, Ru; Wu, Li-Hao; Cai, Jie; Zeng, Tian-Ying; Liu, Hui; Zeng, Ya-Wen; Zhou, Li; Zhan, Zhong-Qun
Blood Pressure Monitoring 28(3):p 163-166, June 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000643
|
194 |
Validation of the DBP-1333b upper-arm blood pressure monitor according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd.1:2020) Guocun Hou, Yulu Wu, Jiaying Wang and Jia Zhi
Blood Pressure Monitoring 2024 Jan 9. | DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000688.
|
205 |
Validation of the YuWell YE660D oscillometric upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinic and home in general population according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd.1:2020) Hui-Jie Zhang, Yue Peng, Juan Zhang, Jin Zhang, Li-Ni Teng, Shu-Juan Zhang, De-Jun Zhou and Ming-Zhi Long. |
Blood Pressure Monitoring 2023, 28:276–279. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000658.
|
231 |
Validation of the Transtek TMB-2266 oscillometric upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinic and self use in general population according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd.1:2020) Zi jian Xie, Li Zhu, Xiao Zheng, Chao ya Li, Jia Hu, Xinda Wang, Hua Deng, Xiaoqin Du, Jiahui Liang, Bin Peng.
Validation of the Transtek TMB-2266 for Clinic and Self BPM.
|
243 |
Validation of the FF680 upper-arm blood pressure monitor according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) for use in clinical and self/home blood pressure monitoring among adults. Hao Chen
Validation of the Hanvon FF680 for Clinic and Self BPM.
|
251 |
Validation of the JAMR upper-arm pressure monitor B23 according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060- 2:2018/AMD 1:2020) Li, Jing; Han, Li-Hong; Feng, Ru; Wu, Li-Hao; Cai, Jie; Zeng, Tian-Ying; Liu, Hui; Wang, Lei; Li, Ju-Yun; Zhan, Zhong-Qun
Blood Pressure Monitoring:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000719, July 30, 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000719
|
Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of Blood Pressure
For a complete list of devices see our Device Index and for discontinued devices see our Discontinued Devices Index.
Device |
Mode |
AAMI |
BHS |
ESH 2002 |
ESH 2010 |
ISO 81060-2:2013 |
ISO 81060-2:2018 |
Circumstance |
Recommendation Ref |
TNO BIO Finometer |
Finger |
Fail |
C/D |
|
|
|
|
Pregnancy; Semi-supine; Protocol adjustments |
Not Recommended 1 |
Fail |
C/B |
|
|
|
|
Normotensive Subgroup |
Fail |
D/D |
|
|
|
|
Pre-eclampsia Subgroup |
Fail |
D/D |
|
|
|
|
Hypertensive Subgroup |
Pass |
A/B |
|
|
|
|
Abstract; Black Women; Protocol violations; Incorrect sample size |
Questionable 2 |
References for Validation of Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of Blood Pressure
1 |
Elvan-Taspinar A, UiterKamp LAMS, Sikkema JM, Bots ML, Koomans HA, Bruinse HW, Franx A. Validation and use of the Finometer for blood pressure measurement in normal, hypertensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancy J Hypertension 2003;21:S2053-2060 |
2 |
Schutte AE, Huisman HW, van Rooyen JM, Malan NT, Schutte R. Validation of the Finometer device for measurement of blood pressure in black women. J Human Hypertens 2004;18(2):79-84 Abstract |
|